Wednesday, December 12, 2012

To Hear or not to Hear

After watching the film Sound Of Fury I was very enlightened. I had never considered deaf culture, or how much it means to people. Since I can hear it is hard for me to understand that being deaf is viewed as a gift in deaf culture. I don't agree; however, with not giving a young child a cochlear implant. I think that a child should grow up learning both deaf culture and hearing culture. In the movie Peter and Nita Artinian are very proud of deaf culture and don't want their children to grow up missing that part of their life. They want their children to have opportunities, but they think deaf culture is more important than hearing culture. On the other hand Chris and Mari Artinian can both hear and want to give their son who was born deaf a cochlear implant to make life better. 

Personally I think both sides are wrong. Why would they want to keep their children boxed in one Discourse when they could be in both. I think that a cochlear implant would be wise to give when a baby because it would be easier to learn and grow with one that young. I think that they should educate their children on both aspects of life by teaching them both sign language and speaking. I think that people that completely isolate their child from another world is a little dramatic. I would want to offer my children both worlds and let them pick, if any side, what they wanted to associate more with.

If you really think about it, giving a child both worlds and opportunities to grow up with is even smarter in the grand scheme of things. They can work in both the hearing world and the deaf world. They can give both worlds equally as much attention instead of being completely isolated with only one way of doing things. That to me seems like a more well rounded and cultured person. 

Friday, November 30, 2012

Fear of Chapped Lips


It's the time. You can smell his pungent cologne. His eyes are big and blue. He's breathing heavier and so are you. He proceeds to say: "I had a really nice time with you tonight." You reply politely thanking him for the dinner and movie, but as you reach to open the Lamborghini door he pulls you back. He looks deeply in your eyes and smiles as he goes in for a goodnight kiss. BUT WAIT. Once he smiles you see the unsightly cracks on the skin of his lips. Huge ridges cover his lips like a 12 mile deep crevasse in a glacier. Your mind goes to the worst hallucination possible: blood starts spurting out of his parched lips as dead skin pieces fly all over covering your face and hair. He is kissing you with his sandpaper lips and it's contagious. Your lips are slowly shriveling up like your sinister partner's. They feel like a raison shrinking and cracking in the sun. Finally you snap back from your dream. Your date is still going in for a goodnight kiss, and you let out a shriek. Quickly, you bolt out of the car, unlock your door, sprint to your bed, hide under the covers, and apply copious amounts of chapstick. Crisis averted.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Wikileaks. Friend or Foe?


Do we deserve to know the truth? Personally I am all for Wikileaks. The population should know what their governments are actually up to. Julian Assange created something that could ultimately help the world. We can't trust the media or our politicians; they would lie in a heartbeat to keep civilians as calm and uneducated as possible. With Wikileaks people can see the facts without the fluff. Assange explained that governments and corporations are spending money to keep things that are being leaked a secret. Why would something that is supposed to help the population keep secrets from the population?

Assange doesn't really consider how illegal Wikileaks can be. He seems to be hiding and traveling around to avoid getting into trouble. People in charge are not happy that their information is leaking out into the public, but then again it's the truth. How can someone punish others for giving the public the truth about what is going on in the world.
 
Maybe I'm just a skeptic and buy into the conspiracies of government too much, but I think that the governments of the world are highly corrupt and secretive. I think that free speech definitely applies to Wikileaks and it isn’t illegal in anyway. If governments are truly for the people then these documents should be able for the public to see anyway. Clearly some information should not be in public domain for the safety of the people but the truth on many issues should be. I have always been all for the truth and letting the public be involved in everything that our country is doing. Without truth we are just puppets they can use and program anyway they wish.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Voting for Race...

For my second found essay I read another article from slate.com called "Why Do White People Think Mitt Romney Should Be President?" by Tom Scocca. The whole article went on saying that republicans only try to get the "white" vote and that many republicans are white men. Even though I did agree with the article I still thought it was a little bias. Clearly Scocca is heavily liberal and will never even consider voting republican. To me being a liberal still means trying to reason with the opposite side. In my opinion democrats should be accepting and willing to listen, that is why I never say anyone's political views are wrong. There is no such thing as wrong.
After reading the article I was a bit scared. I do see Mitt Romney as a fake image that is trying to portray the "white" ideals of America, but I don't think this just because he is a republican. The majority of youth today are becoming more liberal than previous generations, and I think that is making the republicans scared. By advertising more of a "white" image they can gather all of those people that would never vote for any other race. Unfortunately to me this presidential race hasn't been about politics. It's been about does America want white or black and that completely disgusts me. I've never been one to like politics at all, but if I want to make a difference in society I have to pick a side. So maybe neither of the candidates appeal to you but the fact of the matter is we have to live with one of them for 4 more year. Race shouldn't be a factor.

Sexuality and Growing Up

For one of my found essays I decided to read an article by Allison Benedikt from slate.com. The essay was about John Schwartz (a reporter from the New York Times), his family, and his gay son who attempted suicide. Schwartz's son Joseph came out at school as a thirteen year old and tried to kill himself that night. After years of listening to society's negative attitudes about gay lifestyle and his own self hate he attempted to take his own life. John Schwartz wrote a book called Oddly Normal explaining raising his son knowing he was gay including every detail about his childhood.

Personally I think it is awful how society portrays gay lifestyle. Even if families raise their children in a loving manner that accepts them for who they are society still interferes. Children grow up seeing the hatred people in society have for the homosexual population and it is very sad and discouraging. I hope that in the future people will start being more accepting and understanding. I'm sure there would be less attempted suicides.

Friday, August 31, 2012

What Are You Truly Eating?

For the nonfiction assignment I read The Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan. The book was about the secrets behind what we eat in America. The book was split into four sections each explained the different food chains; Industrial, Industrial Organic, Local sustainable, and Hunter – Gatherer. Overall I truly enjoyed the book, mainly because Pollan and I share the same thoughts on what average Americans eat everyday. Reading this book supplied facts that supported my beliefs even more, which I liked. The whole main idea of the book is to encourage people to understand what they’re eating and where it comes from. In today’s society most people are unaware of how, when, and where the food they are consuming was made. Food is no longer a major part of our culture, and people only seem to care that the food they are buying is cheap not healthy.
I really enjoyed that Pollan went on a journey in each food chain. He started with the Industrial food chain because that is what the majority of Americans consume. Industrial food is anything found in a supermarket or a fast food restaurant. I learned about how there is so much corn in the processed foods and meat we eat. The most disturbing part about this chapter was that instead of letting animals like cattle eat what is natural for them (grass), we force them into eating corn because it is cheaper for us. This makes the animals sick since it’s not natural for their bodies’ to digest corn, but since it makes them fat in a short amount of time people don’t seem to care. I also learned about all the harmful pesticides and chemicals sprayed on all of the vegetables grown for supermarkets. It’s crazy how toxic these chemicals are, but we still eat the produce because we aren’t educated on where our food comes from and what people are doing to it.
Pollan then journeyed into the Industrial Organic food chain. The majority of the facts in this section surprised me completely. You would think that all of the food you could get from a Whole Foods or an organic supermarket would be free range, clean, and happy. Unfortunately that thought isn’t entirely correct. Organic vegetables are grown in a separate field right next to the non organic vegetables. The only difference is that the preservatives and hormones are not added to the organic produce. The chicken you think is free range has been locked in a cage for five months until it’s so fat it can’t walk, so when they open the doors to let them roam they can’t. The beef you think is happy is still locked in its own manure; the only difference is it isn’t fed chemicals. The organic image people think of isn’t what it truly is.
My favorite section of the book was the section about Local Sustainable. Pollan went to a farm in Virginia called Polyface. Polyface raises happy grass fed animals they way they’re supposed to be raised, with respect. Reading this section I decided this is how I wanted to get my meat and eggs when I’m living on my own. It is a lot more expensive than food in a grocery store, but it’s all natural. People that buy from local farms like Polyface develop a greater appreciation and relationship with their food and who is growing/raising it. Food is more than just something we eat, and personally I think people need to develop a different sort of relationship with it.
The last section was on hunting and gathering which was very interesting to read about. Not many people hunt and gather all of their food. Pollan went on a journey to make a meal out of food he either hunted or gathered which was hard work and took a long time. The section inspired me to maybe one day make a meal out of things only I killed and found. I presume that it would be a very rewarding and fulfilling experience. So many of us take food for granted, I think that people need to understand what they are eating, and how it’s being made.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

The Never Ending Battle of the Sexes.

Personally, I am all for feminism. But unfortunately reading Mary Wollstonecraft's essay about women's rights was a drag. The first six or so pages were insightful and I enjoyed reading them, but then her writing started getting redundant and boring. After a while I lost interest and felt as if I was reading the same things over and over again.
Luckily I felt that for the most part the problems Wollstonecraft came up with were no longer a problem in today's society (yay). Even though sexism still exists, it has gotten so much better over the years. for example she says: "Women are told from their infancy, and taught by the example of their mothers, that a little knowledge of human weakness, justly termed cunning, softness of temper, outward obedience, and a scrupulous....." which I find is not in our society anymore. All children seem to be taught obedience, but not just girls anymore.
After a while I felt the essay grew to be more of Wollstonecraft complaining and not taking action. The only things she truly suggests are education, but that can only go so far. What about giving women jobs and such? Even though this was written in 1792 I still feel like she could have come up with more creative ideas to help women succeed.
I really liked the vocabulary that Wollstonecraft used, because it helped the whole argument. Overall I thought the points she made were valid, but she seemed to drag the whole essay on. I think it would have had a greater effect on people if the whole essay was shorter and to the point.